Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Policy Strategies for Harnessing Productivity Potential of AI in the U.S. | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
policyPolicy Brief

Policy Strategies for Harnessing Productivity Potential of AI in the U.S.

Date
May 01, 2021
Topics
Workforce, Labor
Read Paper
abstract

Policy Strategies for Harnessing Productivity Potential of AI in the U.S.

Policy Strategies for Harnessing the Productivity Potential of AI in the U.S.

Despite the emergence of new machine learning technologies capable of diagnosing diseases, understanding speech, or recognizing images, the enormous economic potential of many digital goods and services remains largely untapped. In this brief, scholars propose a set of policy recommendations that could increase productivity growth, make the U.S. more competitive, and reduce income inequality.

Key Takeaways

  • The pace of measured productivity growth in the United States has slowed over the past two decades, resulting in a massive gulf of potential GDP lost. We estimate that this is equivalent to $4.2 trillion lost for the year 2019.

  • Failing to properly measure the output of the digital economy and monopolistic behavior by some companies play some role in the slowdown, but the most important factor may be the considerable amount of time and effort required for complementary innovations to keep pace with fundamental technologies like AI.

  • Policymakers can boost productivity by increasing investments in research and development, expanding immigration of high-skilled labor and reinforcing our education system, and removing many of the legal and regulatory bottlenecks that currently exist to business innovation and entrepreneurship.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Erik Brynjolfsson
    Erik Brynjolfsson
  • Seth Benzell
  • Daniel Rock
    Daniel Rock

Related Publications

Policy Implications of DeepSeek AI’s Talent Base
Amy Zegart, Emerson Johnston
Quick ReadMay 06, 2025
Policy Brief

This brief presents an analysis of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek’s talent base and calls for U.S. policymakers to reinvest in competing to attract and retain global AI talent.

Policy Brief

Policy Implications of DeepSeek AI’s Talent Base

Amy Zegart, Emerson Johnston
International Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentFoundation ModelsWorkforce, LaborQuick ReadMay 06

This brief presents an analysis of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek’s talent base and calls for U.S. policymakers to reinvest in competing to attract and retain global AI talent.

Adverse Event Reporting for AI: Developing the Information Infrastructure Government Needs to Learn and Act
Lindsey A. Gailmard, Drew Spence, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadJun 30, 2025
Issue Brief

This brief assesses the benefits of and provides policy recommendations for adverse event reporting systems for AI that report failures and harms post deployment.

Issue Brief

Adverse Event Reporting for AI: Developing the Information Infrastructure Government Needs to Learn and Act

Lindsey A. Gailmard, Drew Spence, Daniel E. Ho
Regulation, Policy, GovernancePrivacy, Safety, SecurityQuick ReadJun 30

This brief assesses the benefits of and provides policy recommendations for adverse event reporting systems for AI that report failures and harms post deployment.

Cleaning Up Policy Sludge: An AI Statutory Research System
Faiz Surani, Lindsey A. Gailmard, Allison Casasola, Varun Magesh, Emily J. Robitschek, Christine Tsang, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadJun 18, 2025
Policy Brief

This brief introduces a novel AI tool that performs statutory surveys to help governments—such as the San Francisco City Attorney Office—identify policy sludge and accelerate legal reform.

Policy Brief

Cleaning Up Policy Sludge: An AI Statutory Research System

Faiz Surani, Lindsey A. Gailmard, Allison Casasola, Varun Magesh, Emily J. Robitschek, Christine Tsang, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Government, Public AdministrationQuick ReadJun 18

This brief introduces a novel AI tool that performs statutory surveys to help governments—such as the San Francisco City Attorney Office—identify policy sludge and accelerate legal reform.

Simulating Human Behavior with AI Agents
Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q. Zou, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Robb Willer, Percy Liang, Michael S. Bernstein
Quick ReadMay 20, 2025
Policy Brief

This brief introduces a generative AI agent architecture that can simulate the attitudes of more than 1,000 real people in response to major social science survey questions.

Policy Brief

Simulating Human Behavior with AI Agents

Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q. Zou, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Robb Willer, Percy Liang, Michael S. Bernstein
Generative AIQuick ReadMay 20

This brief introduces a generative AI agent architecture that can simulate the attitudes of more than 1,000 real people in response to major social science survey questions.